<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Makale Koleksiyonu</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11857/56" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11857/56</id>
<updated>2026-06-02T13:51:08Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T13:51:08Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>DİNSEL ŞİDDET BAĞLAMINDA SETA’NIN&#13;
“ALMANYA’DA İSLAMOFOBİ 2015”&#13;
RAPORUNUN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11857/3432" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Ağçoban, Sıddık</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11857/3432</id>
<updated>2023-01-28T12:11:28Z</updated>
<published>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">DİNSEL ŞİDDET BAĞLAMINDA SETA’NIN&#13;
“ALMANYA’DA İSLAMOFOBİ 2015”&#13;
RAPORUNUN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
Ağçoban, Sıddık
Bugün özellikle Batı Avrupa’daki Müslüman varlığını ele alan sosyolojik&#13;
çalışmaların literatürdeki en orijinal kavramlarından biri “İslamofobi”dir. Bu&#13;
kavramın bu ülkeler için ortak çağrışımları nitelemesi Batı Avrupa ülkelerinde&#13;
yaşayan Müslüman nüfusun entegrasyon, din ve kimlik sorunları ile bu&#13;
sorunların sosyolojik incelemesinin temelde benzer özellikler taşıyor&#13;
olmasındandır. Gerçekten de bugün “İslamofobi” kavramının özellikle Batı&#13;
Avrupa’yla birlikte kullanılıyor olması bu açıdan dikkat çekicidir.&#13;
Teknik bir kavram olarak oldukça yeni olmasına rağmen araştırmalar, bir tutum&#13;
olarak İslamofobi’in yüzyıllar öncesine dayandığını göstermektedir. Hatta bazı&#13;
kaynaklarda İslam dininin ilk yıllarında Müslümanlar hakkında yazılan yazı ve&#13;
aktarılan görüşlerin bugün bu kavramla doğrudan ilişkilendirildiği&#13;
görülmektedir. Sosyo‐politik bir olgu olarak İslamofobi’yle ilgili en büyük sorun&#13;
ise bu olgunun Batılı otoriteler tarafından önemsenmemesi ve sıradan bir&#13;
ayrımcılık sorunu olarak ele alınmasıdır.&#13;
Bu çalışma ana hatlarıyla iki bölümden oluşmaktadır. İlk bölümde kısaca&#13;
Avrupa’daki Müslüman nüfusun güncel kimliği ve İslamofobi’nin kısa tarihi ele&#13;
alınacak ve ardından SETA’nın “European Islamophobia Report 2015” adlı&#13;
raporunun Almanya’yı ele alan kısmı değerlendirilecektir.
</summary>
<dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Al-Jabri's Critique of the Arab-Islamic Mind: A New Reinterpretation in the Context of Religious Education</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11857/3398" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Gümüş, Süleyman</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11857/3398</id>
<updated>2023-01-28T12:11:47Z</updated>
<published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Al-Jabri's Critique of the Arab-Islamic Mind: A New Reinterpretation in the Context of Religious Education
Gümüş, Süleyman
This study aims to reinterpret Jabri's structural analysis of Islamic tradition in the context of Religious Education. In Jabri's theory of Arab-Islamic reason, knowledge is regarding as a tool for the power to transform the sphere. So, he reached to three different orders of knowledge that don't communicate with each other in the crack opened by power while reaching its interests: explication (bayan), intuitive knowledge ('irfan) and demonstration (burhan) and; to policy shaped by religion but soon returned to its unconscious conditions; and to moral conceptions that settled in the gap between knowledge orders and politics. When the problem is taken into consideration in the context of Religious Education, it is noticed that this whole multitude finds its unity in the religiosity of a single historical figure (Person) in its historical conditions. Bayan is the order of knowledge of objective religiosity, 'irfan is the order of knowledge of subjective religiosity.
</summary>
<dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Historical Journey Of The Legal Change In The Hanafi School About The Compensation Of Benefits</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11857/3197" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Yelek, Kamil</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11857/3197</id>
<updated>2023-01-28T12:23:19Z</updated>
<published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Historical Journey Of The Legal Change In The Hanafi School About The Compensation Of Benefits
Yelek, Kamil
The non-compensation of benefits is a basic rule according to the Hanafi school (madhhab). However, the late Hanafi scholars (muta'akhkhirun) made some exceptions to this established rule (zahir al-riwaya) in the madhhab. The exceptions to this rule are the benefits (use-values) of endowment property, orphans' property and property set up for profitable use (mu'add li-l-istighlal). The late Hanatis accepted the view that benefits could only be compensated in these three places by slightly stretching the relevant rule. Fatwas (legal opinions) on this subject were initially discussed in wacirat literature. Later they gained a certain authority by being repeated in many works of the same genre. Finally, this view which has been accepted by the Hanafi Sheikhs (mesaikh), has become a part of the doctrine by taking its place in the later standard texts and legal commentaries (shuruh) of the school. In this study, the question how the rule of zahir al-riwaya in the Hanafi school about the compensation of benefits (daman al-manafi) was revised by the late Hanafis will be discussed. Additionally, the question when the exceptions mentioned were arised will be searched. The incorrectness of some views that have been claimed recently on the subject will be examined by the help of the examples in the Hanafi legal literature.
</summary>
<dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Place of Fuclayl Chalabi's ad-Damanat fi al-furu'al-Hanafiyyah in Compensation Literature</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11857/3196" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Yelek, Kamil</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11857/3196</id>
<updated>2023-01-28T12:17:32Z</updated>
<published>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Place of Fuclayl Chalabi's ad-Damanat fi al-furu'al-Hanafiyyah in Compensation Literature
Yelek, Kamil
The law of responsibility (compensation), which was formed around the concept of the daman and was developed by the scholars within the system of furze' al-fiqh (substantive law) over time, constitutes one of the important parts of Islamic law. Although compensation law (daman) was not addressed as a private subject in the first period fiqh literature, it is seen that the literature on this specific area started to emerge after the early period. It is the Hanafi jurists who first brought together these issues that are scattered in the classical books of fiqh that are related to the law of responsibility. Compensation law took its classical form in the texts of the early periods and was shaped around the views of the founding imams of the Hanafi school (madhab). It has later been expanded with the fatwa and interpretations of the Sheikhs (mesJikh) of Hanafi in the type of waqi'at works. These works were a product of the need for the law to adapt to the new conditions. These issues, which are related to the compensation law in the Hanafi school have been covered as a special section (chapter) in the studies that are classified as waqi'at, such as Usrhshani's al-Fusul flat-mu 'gmalat(Fusul al-Usrashani), 'Imad al-Din al-Marginani's Fusul al-ihkmn fi usul al-ahkMn and Shaykh Badr al-Din's Jani'al-Fusulayn. Later, the topics discussed in these works were developed and continued, and ultimately separate works related to this field have been copyrighted. In this study, the kinds of development and expansion which are in the literature and related subjects will be discussed by examining the above-mentioned works. Therefore; first of all, the first examples of Hanafi jurists related the compensation will be analysed comparatively. Afterwards, the place of ad-Damanat-fi al-funu al-Hanaffyyah of Fudayl Chalabi (d. 991/1583), one of the Zenbillizade's, will be addressed.
</summary>
<dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
